https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367393 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant could avail the SSI exemption despite using a brand name registered by another entity. The Tribunal found that the usage of a brand name, even if registered by another party, did not automatically disqualify an entity from SSI exemption eligibility, based on a previous judgment addressing a similar issue. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the distinction between the brand names "BASANT-BI" and "BASANT," leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant in the case. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:20:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367393 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant could avail the SSI exemption despite using a brand name registered by another entity. The Tribunal found that the usage of a brand name, even if registered by another party, did not automatically disqualify an entity from SSI exemption eligibility, based on a previous judgment addressing a similar issue. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the distinction between the brand names "BASANT-BI" and "BASANT," leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367393