<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1126 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in their favor and setting aside the demand made against them. The Tribunal concluded that Section 11A was not applicable in challenging refund claims sanctioned without appeal, emphasizing that statutory remedies should be followed as prescribed by law. The appellant&#039;s argument that the refund claim was correctly sanctioned as outward freight constituted part of the transaction value was upheld, leading to the unsustainable nature of the demand by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1126 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in their favor and setting aside the demand made against them. The Tribunal concluded that Section 11A was not applicable in challenging refund claims sanctioned without appeal, emphasizing that statutory remedies should be followed as prescribed by law. The appellant&#039;s argument that the refund claim was correctly sanctioned as outward freight constituted part of the transaction value was upheld, leading to the unsustainable nature of the demand by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>