<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1245 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275136</link>
    <description>The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the penalty under Section 271AAA was deleted. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A), ruling that since the Revenue did not inquire about the manner of earning the undisclosed income during the statement recorded under Section 132(4), and taxes were paid, the penalty could not be levied. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, emphasizing substantial compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1245 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275136</link>
      <description>The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the penalty under Section 271AAA was deleted. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A), ruling that since the Revenue did not inquire about the manner of earning the undisclosed income during the statement recorded under Section 132(4), and taxes were paid, the penalty could not be levied. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, emphasizing substantial compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>