https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275138 The ITAT Mumbai bench allowed the appeal of the assessee against the order of the CIT(A), Mumbai, for the assessment years 2011-2012. The Tribunal held that service tax should not be included in turnover for computation under section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, aligning with the decision of the Delhi High Court in the Mitchell Drilling International case. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that there was no merit in including service tax in the total turnover while computing income under section 44BB(1) of the Income Tax Act. en-us Thu, 07 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:49:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275138 The ITAT Mumbai bench allowed the appeal of the assessee against the order of the CIT(A), Mumbai, for the assessment years 2011-2012. The Tribunal held that service tax should not be included in turnover for computation under section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, aligning with the decision of the Delhi High Court in the Mitchell Drilling International case. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that there was no merit in including service tax in the total turnover while computing income under section 44BB(1) of the Income Tax Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275138