<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 983 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275143</link>
    <description>Where a valid arbitration agreement exists, allegations of fraud, including the pendency of a criminal case, do not by themselves prevent reference of the dispute to arbitration when the parties have agreed to that forum. The Court also found that the joinder of a third defendant who was not a signatory to the arbitration agreement did not make the dispute incapable of arbitration, since the substance of the plaint remained an accounting dispute within the contractual arbitration clause. The challenge to reference of the matter to arbitration therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 983 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275143</link>
      <description>Where a valid arbitration agreement exists, allegations of fraud, including the pendency of a criminal case, do not by themselves prevent reference of the dispute to arbitration when the parties have agreed to that forum. The Court also found that the joinder of a third defendant who was not a signatory to the arbitration agreement did not make the dispute incapable of arbitration, since the substance of the plaint remained an accounting dispute within the contractual arbitration clause. The challenge to reference of the matter to arbitration therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>