<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1398 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275145</link>
    <description>Amendment of pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC should ordinarily be permitted where it does not change the nature of the suit or prejudice the opposing party. Here, correction of the plaint valuation to reflect the proper market value did not alter the character of the specific performance action, and the defendant had itself alleged undervaluation. Refusal solely because the revised valuation would shift the suit to the High Court was not a valid ground to deny the amendment. The amendment application ought to have been allowed, and the rejection was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 06:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1398 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275145</link>
      <description>Amendment of pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC should ordinarily be permitted where it does not change the nature of the suit or prejudice the opposing party. Here, correction of the plaint valuation to reflect the proper market value did not alter the character of the specific performance action, and the defendant had itself alleged undervaluation. Refusal solely because the revised valuation would shift the suit to the High Court was not a valid ground to deny the amendment. The amendment application ought to have been allowed, and the rejection was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>