<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1073 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275128</link>
    <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement between PARIDHI PROPERTIES LIMITED and LUMINAIRE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Official Liquidator recommended the dissolution of the Transferor Company, and concerns raised by the Regional Director were addressed by the Transferee Company. The Scheme was found fair, reasonable, compliant with the law, and not against public policy, leading to both Company Scheme Petitions being made absolute. The Petitioner Companies were directed to comply with specified timelines for further actions and to pay costs to relevant parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1073 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275128</link>
      <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement between PARIDHI PROPERTIES LIMITED and LUMINAIRE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Official Liquidator recommended the dissolution of the Transferor Company, and concerns raised by the Regional Director were addressed by the Transferee Company. The Scheme was found fair, reasonable, compliant with the law, and not against public policy, leading to both Company Scheme Petitions being made absolute. The Petitioner Companies were directed to comply with specified timelines for further actions and to pay costs to relevant parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>