<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275118</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case involving the treatment of post-dated cheques under the Income Tax Act, 1961. It ruled that the cheques did not fall under Sections 13(2)(b), (d), or (h) as claimed by the Revenue. The Court agreed that the post-dated cheques were not immediately available for use, no services were provided to the drawer, and the cheque amount did not constitute an investment without compensation. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, with no substantial question of law identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275118</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case involving the treatment of post-dated cheques under the Income Tax Act, 1961. It ruled that the cheques did not fall under Sections 13(2)(b), (d), or (h) as claimed by the Revenue. The Court agreed that the post-dated cheques were not immediately available for use, no services were provided to the drawer, and the cheque amount did not constitute an investment without compensation. As a result, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, with no substantial question of law identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>