https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275117 The Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Bombay High Court's decision, and held that the appropriate Government/specified authority can make a reference for adjudication under Section 25-N(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after rejecting a review application. The Court emphasized that the provision's language using "or" signifies two distinct options, and the review and reference processes are alternative, not cumulative. The judgment stressed interpreting statutory language in its natural sense and adhering to the plain meaning of the law. en-us Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:51:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275117 The Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Bombay High Court's decision, and held that the appropriate Government/specified authority can make a reference for adjudication under Section 25-N(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, even after rejecting a review application. The Court emphasized that the provision's language using "or" signifies two distinct options, and the review and reference processes are alternative, not cumulative. The judgment stressed interpreting statutory language in its natural sense and adhering to the plain meaning of the law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275117