https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275117 Section 25-N(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act confers two alternative courses on the appropriate Government or specified authority: it may either review its order granting or refusing permission, or refer the matter to a Tribunal for adjudication. The statutory use of "or" is disjunctive, so the remedies are not cumulative and cannot be exercised sequentially unless the text clearly so permits. Accordingly, a reference for adjudication is not maintainable after rejection of a review application under Section 25-N(6), and the contrary view was held incorrect by the SC. en-us Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:51:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275117 Section 25-N(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act confers two alternative courses on the appropriate Government or specified authority: it may either review its order granting or refusing permission, or refer the matter to a Tribunal for adjudication. The statutory use of "or" is disjunctive, so the remedies are not cumulative and cannot be exercised sequentially unless the text clearly so permits. Accordingly, a reference for adjudication is not maintainable after rejection of a review application under Section 25-N(6), and the contrary view was held incorrect by the SC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275117