<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275115</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed the disqualification of a candidate for a municipal election based on the number of children at the time of nomination. The interpretation of the disqualification clause in the Haryana Municipal Act was clarified, focusing on the timing of disqualification concerning the birth of additional children after certain amendments. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the disqualification operates after a specific period from the enactment of the Amendment Act, aligning with legislative intent. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the rejection of the appellant&#039;s nomination based on the disqualification criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275115</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed the disqualification of a candidate for a municipal election based on the number of children at the time of nomination. The interpretation of the disqualification clause in the Haryana Municipal Act was clarified, focusing on the timing of disqualification concerning the birth of additional children after certain amendments. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the disqualification operates after a specific period from the enactment of the Amendment Act, aligning with legislative intent. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the rejection of the appellant&#039;s nomination based on the disqualification criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>