https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275115 Section 13A(1)(c) of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973, as amended, was construed to mean that the disqualification for persons having more than two living children took effect from the expiry of one year from the commencement of Haryana Act No. 3 of 1994. The later amending Act No. 15 of 1994 merely substituted a word in the proviso and did not reset the one-year grace period. A purposive reading was applied to harmonise the proviso with the main provision and advance the legislative object. On that construction, the nomination was rightly rejected. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:31:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275115 Section 13A(1)(c) of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973, as amended, was construed to mean that the disqualification for persons having more than two living children took effect from the expiry of one year from the commencement of Haryana Act No. 3 of 1994. The later amending Act No. 15 of 1994 merely substituted a word in the proviso and did not reset the one-year grace period. A purposive reading was applied to harmonise the proviso with the main provision and advance the legislative object. On that construction, the nomination was rightly rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275115