<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1103 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367367</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Special Leave Petition was not entertained on merits because the tax effect was below the CBDT monetary threshold of one crore and the dispute fell within the scope of the Circular. The administrative disposal principle for low-tax-effect matters was applied, leading to dismissal of the petition as covered by the Circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1103 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367367</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Special Leave Petition was not entertained on merits because the tax effect was below the CBDT monetary threshold of one crore and the dispute fell within the scope of the Circular. The administrative disposal principle for low-tax-effect matters was applied, leading to dismissal of the petition as covered by the Circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>