<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1095 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367359</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities to delete the addition of Rs. 4,72,31,590 due to the lack of material evidence and the nature of the transaction being between the partners of the assessed firm in their individual capacity. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the specific circumstances of a transaction and individual capacities while making such additions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1095 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367359</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities to delete the addition of Rs. 4,72,31,590 due to the lack of material evidence and the nature of the transaction being between the partners of the assessed firm in their individual capacity. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the specific circumstances of a transaction and individual capacities while making such additions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>