<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1092 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the levy of late filing fees under section 234E was unsustainable as it was made without the enabling provision under section 200A. The Tribunal emphasized that the adjustment for fees under section 234E was beyond the permissible scope before the relevant amendment. Consequently, the impugned levy of fees was deleted, based on the legal interpretation of provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1092 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the levy of late filing fees under section 234E was unsustainable as it was made without the enabling provision under section 200A. The Tribunal emphasized that the adjustment for fees under section 234E was beyond the permissible scope before the relevant amendment. Consequently, the impugned levy of fees was deleted, based on the legal interpretation of provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>