<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1085 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the revised income tax return filed within the specified time under section 139(1), deleting the addition by the AO. It also supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the addition for cash expenditures based on evidence provided. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the return filed online on the next working day after a holiday as valid, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:50:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1085 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the revised income tax return filed within the specified time under section 139(1), deleting the addition by the AO. It also supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the addition for cash expenditures based on evidence provided. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the return filed online on the next working day after a holiday as valid, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>