https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367345 The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the appeal that was dismissed for non-prosecution and on monetary limits. The appellant's application for restoration was granted as they claimed non-receipt of hearing notices, and the Tribunal found merit in allowing them to contest the case. Additionally, in the interpretation of Notification No. 53/2003 regarding payment of SAD through DFCE scrips, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for cash payment of SAD. The judgment emphasized the significance of correct notification interpretation and ensuring fair opportunities for appellants to present their case. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367345 The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the appeal that was dismissed for non-prosecution and on monetary limits. The appellant's application for restoration was granted as they claimed non-receipt of hearing notices, and the Tribunal found merit in allowing them to contest the case. Additionally, in the interpretation of Notification No. 53/2003 regarding payment of SAD through DFCE scrips, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for cash payment of SAD. The judgment emphasized the significance of correct notification interpretation and ensuring fair opportunities for appellants to present their case. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367345