<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14492</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the release of the books of account and documents seized on September 26, 1995, within one month, with the provision for retaining photostat copies. The court deemed the continued retention beyond 180 days illegal due to the failure to communicate approval and reasons for retention, as required by law under section 132(8) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:13:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14492</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the release of the books of account and documents seized on September 26, 1995, within one month, with the provision for retaining photostat copies. The court deemed the continued retention beyond 180 days illegal due to the failure to communicate approval and reasons for retention, as required by law under section 132(8) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>