<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1076 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367340</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s judgment, dismissing the appeal as the appellant failed to prove the liability of Rs. 4,90,000. The evidence presented was deemed insufficient to establish the claimed debt, and the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was successfully rebutted by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:49:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1076 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367340</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s judgment, dismissing the appeal as the appellant failed to prove the liability of Rs. 4,90,000. The evidence presented was deemed insufficient to establish the claimed debt, and the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was successfully rebutted by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>