<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1069 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367333</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the case concerning taxability under Rent-a-Cab Services. Citing the precedent set in Commissioner of Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise Vs. Sachin Malhotra, the court emphasized that without the transfer of control of the vehicles to the hirer, there is no renting. As the present appeal lacked such transfer of control, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential benefits according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:48:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1069 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367333</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the case concerning taxability under Rent-a-Cab Services. Citing the precedent set in Commissioner of Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise Vs. Sachin Malhotra, the court emphasized that without the transfer of control of the vehicles to the hirer, there is no renting. As the present appeal lacked such transfer of control, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential benefits according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>