<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1066 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands for Commercial or Industrial Construction Service and Construction of Residential Complex Services. The demand for Maintenance Services was upheld. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and relevant Board Circulars to support its decision. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential benefits, and a Miscellaneous Application for a change of Cause Title was also granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1066 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands for Commercial or Industrial Construction Service and Construction of Residential Complex Services. The demand for Maintenance Services was upheld. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and relevant Board Circulars to support its decision. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential benefits, and a Miscellaneous Application for a change of Cause Title was also granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>