<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1065 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367329</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning penalties under Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1994. The tribunal held that as Section 78A was not part of the statute during the disputed period (2008-2012) and was added later in 2013, penalties could not be retroactively imposed on employees for offenses committed by the company. By referencing a prior case, the tribunal emphasized the importance of legal clarity and consistency in penalty imposition, ultimately setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:48:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1065 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367329</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning penalties under Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1994. The tribunal held that as Section 78A was not part of the statute during the disputed period (2008-2012) and was added later in 2013, penalties could not be retroactively imposed on employees for offenses committed by the company. By referencing a prior case, the tribunal emphasized the importance of legal clarity and consistency in penalty imposition, ultimately setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>