<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1064 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the commission received from Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. for using Amadeus Software Systems falls under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) and not Air Travel Agents Service (ATAS), denying exemption under Notification No.22/97-ST. The Tribunal rejected the appeal on taxability under BAS but exercised discretion to remove the penalty under Section 78 due to ongoing litigation, upholding the demand for service tax and interest. The appeal was partly allowed with modifications made by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1064 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the commission received from Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. for using Amadeus Software Systems falls under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) and not Air Travel Agents Service (ATAS), denying exemption under Notification No.22/97-ST. The Tribunal rejected the appeal on taxability under BAS but exercised discretion to remove the penalty under Section 78 due to ongoing litigation, upholding the demand for service tax and interest. The appeal was partly allowed with modifications made by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>