<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1060 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367324</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to drop part of the demand and set aside penalties. The court emphasized the need for tangible evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal and noted that the monetary limit for filing appeals was not met. The issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, and no substantial questions of law were found to arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1060 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367324</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to drop part of the demand and set aside penalties. The court emphasized the need for tangible evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal and noted that the monetary limit for filing appeals was not met. The issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, and no substantial questions of law were found to arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>