<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1058 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. The decision was based on the interpretation of Notification No.214/86-CE, the scope of show cause notices, and the applicability of cenvat credit rules to job work goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining clarity and consistency in demands raised through show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 05:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1058 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. The decision was based on the interpretation of Notification No.214/86-CE, the scope of show cause notices, and the applicability of cenvat credit rules to job work goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining clarity and consistency in demands raised through show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>