<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275105</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessment for computing capital gains should be based on the value of assets as on 1st April 2011, not the revalued value. It was determined that there was no substantial question of law involved in the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, as the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings were upheld. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275105</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessment for computing capital gains should be based on the value of assets as on 1st April 2011, not the revalued value. It was determined that there was no substantial question of law involved in the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, as the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings were upheld. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>