<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1046 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367310</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the respondent&#039;s issuance of a notice for final adjudication during the pendency of the appeal was improper and in violation of principles of natural justice. The Court directed respondent No.2 to refrain from taking any coercive action until the appeal was decided by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 05:44:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1046 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367310</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the respondent&#039;s issuance of a notice for final adjudication during the pendency of the appeal was improper and in violation of principles of natural justice. The Court directed respondent No.2 to refrain from taking any coercive action until the appeal was decided by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>