<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 704 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275093</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Income Tax Appeal due to a one-day delay in filing and failure to seek condonation of delay. The High Court initially held it lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay, but the Apex Court allowed the Revenue to file a Notice of Motion within a specified timeframe. However, the Revenue filed the Notice of Motion late, leading to its dismissal by the High Court. Consequently, the appeal papers were to be consigned to the record department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 704 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275093</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Income Tax Appeal due to a one-day delay in filing and failure to seek condonation of delay. The High Court initially held it lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay, but the Apex Court allowed the Revenue to file a Notice of Motion within a specified timeframe. However, the Revenue filed the Notice of Motion late, leading to its dismissal by the High Court. Consequently, the appeal papers were to be consigned to the record department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>