https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275085 A mortgage term allowing the mortgagee to remain in possession for twelve years could not suspend the mortgagor's statutory right of redemption under Section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Even if the instrument were treated as an anomalous mortgage, the deed had to be read consistently with the Act, and any clause inconsistent with the right to redeem yielded to that statutory right. The redemption suit was therefore not premature. Accounts and the decree were to be framed in accordance with the mortgage terms only so far as they did not conflict with the right of redemption. en-us Fri, 09 Dec 1921 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:52:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275085 A mortgage term allowing the mortgagee to remain in possession for twelve years could not suspend the mortgagor's statutory right of redemption under Section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Even if the instrument were treated as an anomalous mortgage, the deed had to be read consistently with the Act, and any clause inconsistent with the right to redeem yielded to that statutory right. The redemption suit was therefore not premature. Accounts and the decree were to be framed in accordance with the mortgage terms only so far as they did not conflict with the right of redemption. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Dec 1921 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275085