<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 873 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275083</link>
    <description>Where co-defendants have conflicting interests on a material issue, each side must be allowed to cross-examine the other to test adverse evidence. The right is limited to the extent of the disputed overlap and does not extend beyond the controversy between the defendants. Any concern about collusion remains a matter for trial. A co-defendant is therefore entitled to cross-examine another co-defendant when their interests conflict on the material question in issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:50:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 873 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275083</link>
      <description>Where co-defendants have conflicting interests on a material issue, each side must be allowed to cross-examine the other to test adverse evidence. The right is limited to the extent of the disputed overlap and does not extend beyond the controversy between the defendants. Any concern about collusion remains a matter for trial. A co-defendant is therefore entitled to cross-examine another co-defendant when their interests conflict on the material question in issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>