<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1010 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367274</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the University against orders of the ld. CIT (A) for assessment years 2009-10 to 2015-16 under the IT Act were dismissed as barred by limitation due to a delay of 87 days attributed to wrong advice from Counsel. The delay was later condoned by the Tribunal, emphasizing a liberal approach in condoning delays when genuine reasons are established. The matter was remanded for adjudication on merits by the ld. CIT (A) following the decision pronounced on 04/09/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:02:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1010 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367274</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the University against orders of the ld. CIT (A) for assessment years 2009-10 to 2015-16 under the IT Act were dismissed as barred by limitation due to a delay of 87 days attributed to wrong advice from Counsel. The delay was later condoned by the Tribunal, emphasizing a liberal approach in condoning delays when genuine reasons are established. The matter was remanded for adjudication on merits by the ld. CIT (A) following the decision pronounced on 04/09/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>