https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367269 Amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is generally permitted, but it may be refused where it changes the character of the suit or prejudices the opposite party. Here, the plaintiff sought to give up one monetary component while continuing damages on the same transaction, in a manner linked to parallel proceedings and an inconsistent stance between rescission and enforcement. The court treated the request as a disguised withdrawal of part of the claim, especially because it was made after the connected tribunal proceedings had advanced and directions had been issued to remove overlapping reliefs. The amendment was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367269 Amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is generally permitted, but it may be refused where it changes the character of the suit or prejudices the opposite party. Here, the plaintiff sought to give up one monetary component while continuing damages on the same transaction, in a manner linked to parallel proceedings and an inconsistent stance between rescission and enforcement. The court treated the request as a disguised withdrawal of part of the claim, especially because it was made after the connected tribunal proceedings had advanced and directions had been issued to remove overlapping reliefs. The amendment was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367269