<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1003 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The appellant&#039;s claim of subsuming export obligations under EOU was not refuted, and the pending application for Export Obligation Discharge Certificate was emphasized. The Tribunal directed expedited processing of the request, stressing thorough examination of the subsumed export obligations claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:01:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1003 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The appellant&#039;s claim of subsuming export obligations under EOU was not refuted, and the pending application for Export Obligation Discharge Certificate was emphasized. The Tribunal directed expedited processing of the request, stressing thorough examination of the subsumed export obligations claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>