https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367257 The High Court upheld the first Appellate Court's decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving a loan dispute and a dishonored cheque. The appellant's appeal challenging the acquittal was dismissed, emphasizing the principle of giving the benefit of the doubt to the accused in cases of conflicting evidence. The judgment of the trial court convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not confirmed, resulting in the affirmation of the respondent's acquittal. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:01:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367257 The High Court upheld the first Appellate Court's decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving a loan dispute and a dishonored cheque. The appellant's appeal challenging the acquittal was dismissed, emphasizing the principle of giving the benefit of the doubt to the accused in cases of conflicting evidence. The judgment of the trial court convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not confirmed, resulting in the affirmation of the respondent's acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367257