https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367246 The appeal was allowed as the appellant's actions aligned with legal requirements regarding maintaining separate records for input services under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's compliance, including the reversal of proportionate credit and intimation to the Department, was considered sufficient. The impugned order demanding payment under the Central Excise Act, 1944, was set aside, emphasizing the significance of procedural compliance and substantial adherence to legal requirements in excise matters. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367246 The appeal was allowed as the appellant's actions aligned with legal requirements regarding maintaining separate records for input services under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant's compliance, including the reversal of proportionate credit and intimation to the Department, was considered sufficient. The impugned order demanding payment under the Central Excise Act, 1944, was set aside, emphasizing the significance of procedural compliance and substantial adherence to legal requirements in excise matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367246