https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367243 The appeals centered on the applicability of Rule 7 or Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules for determining the assessable value of goods cleared for service contracts. The Tribunal reiterated that the value should be determined as per CAS-4 under Rule 8, a decision previously upheld by the Apex Court. Emphasizing the importance of consistency and adherence to earlier rulings, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeals and dismissed the revenue's appeals, affirming the valuation method under Rule 8 for excisable goods in service contract scenarios. en-us Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367243 The appeals centered on the applicability of Rule 7 or Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules for determining the assessable value of goods cleared for service contracts. The Tribunal reiterated that the value should be determined as per CAS-4 under Rule 8, a decision previously upheld by the Apex Court. Emphasizing the importance of consistency and adherence to earlier rulings, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeals and dismissed the revenue's appeals, affirming the valuation method under Rule 8 for excisable goods in service contract scenarios. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367243