<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1227 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order regarding the taxability of renting immovable property due to limitation issues. The matter was remanded for reevaluation within the limitation period, emphasizing adherence to statutory limits in tax matters and the impact of retrospective amendments on tax demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1227 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order regarding the taxability of renting immovable property due to limitation issues. The matter was remanded for reevaluation within the limitation period, emphasizing adherence to statutory limits in tax matters and the impact of retrospective amendments on tax demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>