<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1616 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275072</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 1024/Hyd/16 regarding the addition of unexplained income under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 1025/Hyd/2016 concerning the penalty confirmation under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, overturning the penalty imposed by the AO. The judgments were pronounced on 26th May 2017 by the ITAT Hyderabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 20:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1616 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275072</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 1024/Hyd/16 regarding the addition of unexplained income under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 1025/Hyd/2016 concerning the penalty confirmation under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, overturning the penalty imposed by the AO. The judgments were pronounced on 26th May 2017 by the ITAT Hyderabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>