https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275059 In second appeal, the High Court cannot disturb concurrent findings of fact unless those findings are vitiated by an error of law. That restriction applies even where the factual conclusion is drawn from documentary evidence treated as historical material rather than title instruments. A mistaken construction of documents, or an inference from them that appears erroneous, does not by itself convert the issue into a question of law. The High Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to reverse the lower appellate court's factual findings in the absence of a legal error. en-us Tue, 16 Jan 1934 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:08:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275059 In second appeal, the High Court cannot disturb concurrent findings of fact unless those findings are vitiated by an error of law. That restriction applies even where the factual conclusion is drawn from documentary evidence treated as historical material rather than title instruments. A mistaken construction of documents, or an inference from them that appears erroneous, does not by itself convert the issue into a question of law. The High Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to reverse the lower appellate court's factual findings in the absence of a legal error. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Jan 1934 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275059