https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275060 Whether an oral sale extinguishing a mortgage had been proved was treated as a question of fact, not a question of law, because the courts had weighed oral and documentary evidence together with the statutory presumption. Record-of-rights entries under Section 44 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, were evidentiary material only and not title-deeds or the direct source of rights. In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, interference was not justified merely because a lower court may have drawn an erroneous inference from the evidence. The finding that no sale was proved therefore stood final, and the appeal failed. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:08:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275060 Whether an oral sale extinguishing a mortgage had been proved was treated as a question of fact, not a question of law, because the courts had weighed oral and documentary evidence together with the statutory presumption. Record-of-rights entries under Section 44 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, were evidentiary material only and not title-deeds or the direct source of rights. In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, interference was not justified merely because a lower court may have drawn an erroneous inference from the evidence. The finding that no sale was proved therefore stood final, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Dec 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275060