<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1174 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275057</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and the first appellate court, and restored the trial court&#039;s decree for possession. The Respondents were found to be gratuitous licensees without any legal right to possession. The Appellants were granted possession of the suit portions, and the Respondents were directed to vacate within sixty days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1174 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275057</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and the first appellate court, and restored the trial court&#039;s decree for possession. The Respondents were found to be gratuitous licensees without any legal right to possession. The Appellants were granted possession of the suit portions, and the Respondents were directed to vacate within sixty days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>