https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275056 An unregistered instrument that is in substance a lease or counterpart of a lease cannot be received in evidence to prove tenancy terms. The prior rent-enhancement decree did not operate as res judicata on whether the tenancy was permanent, because the earlier proceedings did not finally and bindingly determine that issue between the parties. The character of a tenancy as permanent or precarious is a legal inference from proved facts, so it may be examined in second appeal where the issue is not a pure question of fact. On the facts considered, permanent tenancy was not established. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 1927 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:28:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275056 An unregistered instrument that is in substance a lease or counterpart of a lease cannot be received in evidence to prove tenancy terms. The prior rent-enhancement decree did not operate as res judicata on whether the tenancy was permanent, because the earlier proceedings did not finally and bindingly determine that issue between the parties. The character of a tenancy as permanent or precarious is a legal inference from proved facts, so it may be examined in second appeal where the issue is not a pure question of fact. On the facts considered, permanent tenancy was not established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Mar 1927 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275056