<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1533 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275054</link>
    <description>A prior decision in the assessee&#039;s own case was treated as covering the question of law raised in the present tax appeal, so no fresh or arguable legal issue remained for reconsideration. On that basis, the Court applied the earlier precedent and declined interference, disposing of the appeal by consent without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1533 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275054</link>
      <description>A prior decision in the assessee&#039;s own case was treated as covering the question of law raised in the present tax appeal, so no fresh or arguable legal issue remained for reconsideration. On that basis, the Court applied the earlier precedent and declined interference, disposing of the appeal by consent without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>