<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 660 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275053</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled that excise duty and sales tax should be excluded from the turnover for Section 80HHC deduction, favoring the assessee. The tribunal dismissed the issue of excluding 90% of miscellaneous receipts from profit due to lack of prior adjudication. The assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 1995-96 was dismissed due to an inordinate delay of 310 days, which was not condoned, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 1996-97, delayed by 20 days, was condoned. The tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 1996-97, upholding the exclusion of excise duty and sales tax from turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 660 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275053</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled that excise duty and sales tax should be excluded from the turnover for Section 80HHC deduction, favoring the assessee. The tribunal dismissed the issue of excluding 90% of miscellaneous receipts from profit due to lack of prior adjudication. The assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 1995-96 was dismissed due to an inordinate delay of 310 days, which was not condoned, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 1996-97, delayed by 20 days, was condoned. The tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 1996-97, upholding the exclusion of excise duty and sales tax from turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>