<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 10 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s petition seeking cancellation of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1982-83. The Tribunal found discrepancies in income assessment were due to differing estimates on income and expenditure, not deliberate concealment. As the variations arose from contrasting opinions between the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner, the Tribunal concluded there was no concrete evidence of income suppression. Therefore, the penalty was canceled, with the Tribunal stating no legal issue arose as it was a matter of diverging estimates, not intentional concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:15:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 10 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s petition seeking cancellation of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1982-83. The Tribunal found discrepancies in income assessment were due to differing estimates on income and expenditure, not deliberate concealment. As the variations arose from contrasting opinions between the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner, the Tribunal concluded there was no concrete evidence of income suppression. Therefore, the penalty was canceled, with the Tribunal stating no legal issue arose as it was a matter of diverging estimates, not intentional concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>