https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367205 Employees appointed for a specific project could not claim reinstatement or absorption as of right after the project was bona fide closed on an administrative decision and paucity of funds. The termination was held non-stigmatic and non-punitive because the appointment letters allowed notice-based termination without reasons, and the references in the orders did not change the real basis of closure. The challenge to termination therefore failed, as did the claim for absorption in another government department. The Court, however, directed release of admitted terminal dues, including CPF, leave encashment and gratuity, with interest if unpaid. en-us Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367205 Employees appointed for a specific project could not claim reinstatement or absorption as of right after the project was bona fide closed on an administrative decision and paucity of funds. The termination was held non-stigmatic and non-punitive because the appointment letters allowed notice-based termination without reasons, and the references in the orders did not change the real basis of closure. The challenge to termination therefore failed, as did the claim for absorption in another government department. The Court, however, directed release of admitted terminal dues, including CPF, leave encashment and gratuity, with interest if unpaid. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367205