<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 938 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367202</link>
    <description>A retrospective monetary cap on export incentive entitlement under the Foreign Trade Policy was found inconsistent with the scheme&#039;s object and the policy framework, so the restriction was quashed as without jurisdiction, arbitrary, illegal and capricious. The authority could not reject the exporter&#039;s claim merely because the amount claimed exceeded the stated monetary figure during the relevant financial year; it had to examine the claim on merits, undertake the prescribed scrutiny, and pass a reasoned speaking order. The writ petition succeeded, and the competent authority was directed to decide the incentive claim afresh in accordance with the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 938 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367202</link>
      <description>A retrospective monetary cap on export incentive entitlement under the Foreign Trade Policy was found inconsistent with the scheme&#039;s object and the policy framework, so the restriction was quashed as without jurisdiction, arbitrary, illegal and capricious. The authority could not reject the exporter&#039;s claim merely because the amount claimed exceeded the stated monetary figure during the relevant financial year; it had to examine the claim on merits, undertake the prescribed scrutiny, and pass a reasoned speaking order. The writ petition succeeded, and the competent authority was directed to decide the incentive claim afresh in accordance with the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>