<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 28 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14464</link>
    <description>The court found that the notice issued by the assessing authority lacked proper consideration and specificity, encompassing amounts from different periods rather than focusing on the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, citing non-compliance with legal standards. The petition was allowed, with the court directing the respondents not to proceed further based on the flawed notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 28 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14464</link>
      <description>The court found that the notice issued by the assessing authority lacked proper consideration and specificity, encompassing amounts from different periods rather than focusing on the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the court quashed the notice, citing non-compliance with legal standards. The petition was allowed, with the court directing the respondents not to proceed further based on the flawed notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>