https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367190 The court upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the respondent/accused in a case involving an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant's challenge was dismissed due to discrepancies in evidence, non-production of crucial documents, and defects in the power of attorney document. The court found the respondent's version of events more credible, including their role as collection agents and the availability of funds in their account, leading to the confirmation of the acquittal and dismissal of the criminal appeal. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:39:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367190 The court upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the respondent/accused in a case involving an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant's challenge was dismissed due to discrepancies in evidence, non-production of crucial documents, and defects in the power of attorney document. The court found the respondent's version of events more credible, including their role as collection agents and the availability of funds in their account, leading to the confirmation of the acquittal and dismissal of the criminal appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367190