https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367189 The court allowed CRP (NPD) (MD) No. 2332 of 2008, directing the Petitioner to deposit the decreetal amount within four weeks, and the Respondent bank to return the bid amount to the auction purchaser. The court dismissed CRP (MD) No. 535 of 2017, confirming the Trial Court's order that the suit was maintainable. The court emphasized the need for banks to act fairly and not pursue inconsistent remedies, protecting the debtor's rights and ensuring the sanctity of judicial proceedings. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:39:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367189 The court allowed CRP (NPD) (MD) No. 2332 of 2008, directing the Petitioner to deposit the decreetal amount within four weeks, and the Respondent bank to return the bid amount to the auction purchaser. The court dismissed CRP (MD) No. 535 of 2017, confirming the Trial Court's order that the suit was maintainable. The court emphasized the need for banks to act fairly and not pursue inconsistent remedies, protecting the debtor's rights and ensuring the sanctity of judicial proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367189