<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 909 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to set aside the Order-in-Original, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding CENVAT credit availed on capital goods. The Tribunal determined that the iron and steel items were used in manufacturing capital goods for captive use in the factory, falling under an exemption notification. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents that favored the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 909 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to set aside the Order-in-Original, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding CENVAT credit availed on capital goods. The Tribunal determined that the iron and steel items were used in manufacturing capital goods for captive use in the factory, falling under an exemption notification. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents that favored the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>