https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367170 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant relief to avail Cenvat Credit on disputed supplementary invoices from Coal Companies. The Tribunal distinguished between 'suppression' and 'confusion,' emphasizing the absence of fraud or suppression by the appellant. Despite a pending challenge before the Apex Court regarding the issue with SECL, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions did not constitute suppression under Rule 9 (1) (b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367170 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant relief to avail Cenvat Credit on disputed supplementary invoices from Coal Companies. The Tribunal distinguished between 'suppression' and 'confusion,' emphasizing the absence of fraud or suppression by the appellant. Despite a pending challenge before the Apex Court regarding the issue with SECL, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions did not constitute suppression under Rule 9 (1) (b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367170